Destroying the World: Reviewing Andrew Culp’s “Dark Deleuze”

The Farmington Review

Review by Curtis Cole

                Published under the University of Minnesota’s “Forerunners” series, or, short titles “written between fresh ideas and finished books”, Andrew Culp’s bold academic novella Dark Deleuze, initiates a great, albeit unfinished project—re-oriented Gilles Deleuze, that ceaseless thinker of the joyous, to a negative standing in which the inherent revolutionary communism of Deleuzianism may be unleashed.

It is, in other words, a fine endeavor. But it is not an endeavor which will appeal to the serious Deleuze scholar. Why is because of the nature of the title: short and choppy, this is a work which aims at putting forward hypotheses supported only by the scantiest of philosophical argumentation. Though I did not find this troublesome since I wholly accepted the nature of Culp’s publication, as a work-in-progress reconceptualization, it will likely not appear that way to the mainstream Deleuze researcher, especially those liberal agents of counterrevolution…

View original post 515 more words


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s